Capital markets

Investment managers, acting on behalf of their retail and institutional clients, are among the largest investors in financial markets. They represent a key component of the market’s “buy-side” segment.

In representing the interests of its members on wholesale capital market issues, EFAMA advocates for fair, deep, liquid, and transparent capital markets, supported by properly regulated and supervised market infrastructure.

Related policy positions

Policy position

Capital Markets

MIFID

Distribution ＆ Client Disclosures

11 June 2021

MiFID: EFAMA replies to ESMA consultation on RTS 2 Annual Review

EFAMA replied to a specific question on moving to stage 3 for the determination of the liquidity assessment of bonds.

Policy position

Capital Markets

MIFID

Distribution ＆ Client Disclosures

29 April 2021

ESMA consults on guidelines of the MIFID II appropriateness and execution-only requirements

EFAMA agrees in principle with many of ESMA’s suggested approaches in their consultation on guidelines on certain aspects of the MIFID II appropriateness and execution-only requirements. However, certain, essential elements still require further considerations before finalising these Guidelines.

Policy Position

Capital Markets

CSDR

12 March 2021

Joint trade association letter regarding Implementation of CSDR SDR

On 11 March 2021, EFAMA and 14 trade associations representing a wide range of stakeholders in the European and global financial markets wrote to the European Commission and ESMA raising concerns about the implementation of the mandatory buy-in requirement under the EU’s CSDR Settlement Discipline Regime.

EFAMA’s reply to ESMA’s consultation paper on the opinion on Trading Venue Perimeter

We welcome this opportunity to comment on a review of the TV perimeter, and support ESMA’s objective of clarifying when systems and facilities qualify as multilateral.

Policy Position

Capital Markets

EMIR

08 April 2022

EFAMA views and recommendations on ESMA's consultation on the review of EMIR RTS on APC margin measures

The European Fund and Asset Management Association (EFAMA) welcomes the opportunity to respond to this important review of RTS 153/2013 and accompanying guidelines, in light of the procyclicality witnessed during the peak volatility of the Covid crisis. European CCPs already have standard anti-procyclicality tools in their rulebooks and this did lead to less volatile moves in margin in Europe versus other jurisdictions.

Press Release