Capital markets

Investment managers, acting on behalf of their retail and institutional clients, are among the largest investors in financial markets. They represent a key component of the market’s “buy-side” segment.

In representing the interests of its members on wholesale capital market issues, EFAMA advocates for fair, deep, liquid, and transparent capital markets, supported by properly regulated and supervised market infrastructure.

Related policy positions

Policy position

Capital Markets

MIFID

22 December 2021

EFAMA’s response to ESMA’s Review of the MiFID II framework on best execution reports

This is a timely and necessary review to which we hope to contribute in a constructive manner. As already recognised in the consultation paper and in the MiFID Quick Fix proposal, RTS 27 and RTS 28 currently fall short of the objective of providing valuable and comparable datasets for investment managers and the investing public. We appreciate the present effort to revise reporting requirements to produce more meaningful reports.

Policy Position

Capital Markets

CSDR

22 December 2021

Industry Approach to CSDR Settlement Discipline Regime

The Joint Associations¹ welcome clarification from ESMA that national competent authorities are expected not to prioritise supervisory actions in relation to the application of the CSDR buy-in regime.²

Policy Position

Capital Markets

MIFID

15 December 2021

Joint Statement on EU Commission proposal for revised Market in Financial Instrument Regulation (MiFIR)

We see great value in the creation of a consolidated tape to support Europe’s capital markets. However, we qualify that statement with a reminder that the framework for a successful consolidated tape should

i) address the known market failure around market data costs,

EFAMA’s reply to ESMA’s consultation paper on the opinion on Trading Venue Perimeter

We welcome this opportunity to comment on a review of the TV perimeter, and support ESMA’s objective of clarifying when systems and facilities qualify as multilateral.

Policy Position

Capital Markets

EMIR

08 April 2022

EFAMA views and recommendations on ESMA's consultation on the review of EMIR RTS on APC margin measures

The European Fund and Asset Management Association (EFAMA) welcomes the opportunity to respond to this important review of RTS 153/2013 and accompanying guidelines, in light of the procyclicality witnessed during the peak volatility of the Covid crisis. European CCPs already have standard anti-procyclicality tools in their rulebooks and this did lead to less volatile moves in margin in Europe versus other jurisdictions.

Press Release

Capital Markets

MIFID

16 February 2022

EFAMA – the urgency behind a consolidated tape for Europe | A buy-side view on consolidated tape and market structure reforms

The European Fund and Asset Management Association (EFAMA) has today published its position paper on the European Commission’s proposed Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation review which establishes a blueprint for a consolidated tape (CT) across Europe’s capital markets.

all news

Related publications

Publication

Capital Markets

MIFID

Data

Distribution ＆ Client Disclosures

04 March 2020

3 Questions to Rudolf Siebel on Market Data Costs

Q #1 Have you witnessed an increase in the cost of market data over the last couple of years? If so, how can it be explained?

Publication

Capital Markets

Capital Markets Union

Competitiveness

EU Fund regulation

International agenda

Management Companies

Sustainable Finance

Tax ＆ Accounting

17 September 2019

Asset Management Report 2019

The EFAMA Asset Management in Europe report aims at providing facts and figures to gain a better understanding of the role of the European asset management industry. It takes a different approach from that of the other EFAMA research reports, on two grounds. Firstly, this report does not focus exclusively on investment funds, but it also analyses the assets that are managed by asset managers under the form of discretionary mandates. Secondly, the report focuses on the countries where the investment fund assets are managed rather than on the countries in which the funds are domiciled.

Publication