Capital markets

Investment managers, acting on behalf of their retail and institutional clients, are among the largest investors in financial markets. They represent a key component of the market’s “buy-side” segment.

In representing the interests of its members on wholesale capital market issues, EFAMA advocates for fair, deep, liquid, and transparent capital markets, supported by properly regulated and supervised market infrastructure.

Related policy positions

Press Release

Capital Markets

MIFID

Capital Markets Union

25 November 2021

EFAMA welcomes proposal on affordable consolidated tape - The association continues to urge action on market data costs

EFAMA is pleased to read today the details of a robust MiFIR proposal from the European Commission addressing key areas of reform around the creation of a consolidated tape (CT), along with adjustments to transparency requirements on trading. 

Policy position

Capital Markets

19 November 2021

ESMA Consultation on the review of certain aspects of the short selling regulation

EFAMA welcomes this opportunity to comment on the review of the provisions within the Short Selling Regulation. We have limited our responses to those questions of most relevance to our membership.

Policy Position

Capital Markets

EMIR

16 September 2021

UK clearing house equivalence - request from nine trade associations

Nine associations (AFME, AIMA, EAPB, EBF, EFAMA, FIA, ICI, ISDA, SIFMA AMG) welcome the Commission's decision to grant a time-limited equivalence decision in respect of UK CCPs. However, when this time-limited equivalence decision expires on 30 June 2022, there remains a significant risk of disruption to clearing for EU firms and to their access to global markets.

Joint association letter on the CSDR Settlement Discipline implementation timeline

On 14 July 2021, sixteen trade associations, representing buy-side, sell-side and market infrastructures, wrote to ESMA and the European Commission regarding the timeline for implementation of the mandatory buy-in rules as part of the CSDR Settlement Discipline Regime.

The Joint Associations welcome the Report from the Commission on the CSDR Review published in July 2021 and fully support the Commission’s intention to consider amendments to the mandatory buy-in regime, subject to an impact assessment.

Policy Position

Capital Markets

MIFID

07 July 2021

Ensuring a market structure and a transparency regime which facilitate liquidity, investors’ choice, and funding of companies | Joint statement

Well-functioning and liquid capital markets are fostered by an efficient market structure and supporting legislative frameworks. A diverse and efficient market structure reduces the costs of trading whilst promoting best execution. This optimises funding opportunities for issuers and maximises returns for investors and savers.

Publication

Capital Markets

Benchmarks

06 July 2021

3 Questions to Jean-Louis Schirmann on the use of EURIBOR

Q #1 How was Euribor impacted by the adoption of the Benchmark Regulation (BMR) and what are the relevant features of the reformed Euribor for investment managers?

all news

Related publications

Publication

Capital Markets

MIFID

Data

Distribution ＆ Client Disclosures

04 March 2020

3 Questions to Rudolf Siebel on Market Data Costs

Q #1 Have you witnessed an increase in the cost of market data over the last couple of years? If so, how can it be explained?

Publication

Capital Markets

Capital Markets Union

Competitiveness

EU Fund regulation

International agenda

Management Companies

Sustainable Finance

Tax ＆ Accounting

17 September 2019

Asset Management Report 2019

The EFAMA Asset Management in Europe report aims at providing facts and figures to gain a better understanding of the role of the European asset management industry. It takes a different approach from that of the other EFAMA research reports, on two grounds. Firstly, this report does not focus exclusively on investment funds, but it also analyses the assets that are managed by asset managers under the form of discretionary mandates. Secondly, the report focuses on the countries where the investment fund assets are managed rather than on the countries in which the funds are domiciled.

Publication