Financial stability
At the international level the FSB, together with IOSCO, are responsible for implementing policies that address structural vulnerabilities arising from asset management activities. Several regulatory actions have been taken to ensure the resilience of the asset management sector since the global financial crisis. The EU’s current risk management regime has recently been put to the test by the Covid-19-led market stress, proving its overall resilience.
Future regulation should be targeted, risk-based and reflect the differing risk profiles of Non-Bank Financial Institutions (NBFI) entities and activities. EFAMA and its members are committed to working closely with international and European regulators on the ongoing improvement of investment funds’ existing risk management framework, and to foster the development of best practices within the investment management industry.
EFAMA Response to IOSCO Consultation report on Leverage
Use of Leverage in Investment Funds in Europe | AMIC-EFAMA Joint Paper
EFAMA reply to FSB consultation on proposed policy recommendations to address structural vulnerabilities from asset management activities
EFAMA firstly wishes to commend the FSB’s change of focus in the course of 2015, from a proposed assessment methodology intended to identify non-bank, non-insurance globally systemically important financial institutions (NBNI G-SIFIs) to a revised and more objective focus on asset management activities. Although we understand the former framework may be revisited by the FSB once its Recommendations are finalised, we appreciate that certain key characteristics of the asset management industry have been recognised and well reflected in the present consultative document.
EBA & ESMA discussion paper on the Commission’s call for advice on the prudential framework for investment firms
FSB consultation on liquidity preparedness for margin calls in non-bank financial intermediation
EFAMA agrees with the FSB that market participants should integrate the management of margin and collateral calls into their risk management, governance, and operational processes.
Don’t add complexity to fund liquidity management rules without clear added benefits, says EFAMA
Protecting long-term investors from material dilution is a legitimate objective, however, EFAMA doubts that the FSB draft proposals on structural vulnerabilities in the open-ended fund (OEF) sector and the IOSCO ones on anti-dilution liquidity management tools (LMTs) would increase the resilience of the OEF sector. In our view, this framework would add unnecessary complexity to liquidity risk management and, ultimately, result in higher costs for end-investors with little benefit.
Joint EFAMA & AMIC report on liquidity stress tests in investment funds - January 2019
Solvency II: Data Impacts on Asset Management
The report highlights the need for the asset management industry to proactively work with European insurance companies to respond to the strategic changes caused by the Solvency II Directive.
