We disagree with an extension of its scope to UCITS’ and AIFs’ management companies to the scope of the reporting requirements imposed by MiFIR, Art. 26. This extension would be in breach of the principle of proportionality, as:
Distribution & Client Disclosures
EFAMA monitors issues surrounding fund distribution and disclosures to investors. These include investor protection and disclosure issues arising from the evolving PRIIPs and MiFID frameworks, the shift towards digital distribution tools, and the continued integration of ESG considerations into fund products.
Related policy positions
Policy position
Capital Markets
Distribution ＆ Client Disclosures
EU Fund regulation
UCITS
23 November 2020
EFAMA's reply to ESMA's CP on MiFIR Review report on the obligations to report transactions & reference data
Policy position
Distribution ＆ Client Disclosures
Management Companies
Sustainable Finance
27 July 2020
Associations Letter: Integration of sustainability factors and risks into MiFID II IDD and Solvency II
Policy position
Capital Markets
MIFID
Distribution ＆ Client Disclosures
Sustainable Finance
08 July 2020
EFAMA responds to EC draft DA on integration of ESG into MiFID II
Related news
Publication
MIFID
Distribution ＆ Client Disclosures
PRIIPs
Management Companies
AIFMD
03 June 2020
Investment Funds Distributor Due Diligence Questionnaire
Funds face unique challenges in performing intermediary oversight, and especially so because of MiFID II requirements, changing regulatory landscapes, and the absence of an industry agreed-upon standard between funds and their distribution channels. To help address these challenges, a dedicated working group developed a uniform due diligence questionnaire (DDQ) that will serve as the standard for investment funds (UCITS and AIFs) in performing onboarding and ongoing oversight of distribution channels.
Press Release
Capital Markets
MIFID
Distribution ＆ Client Disclosures
22 May 2020
EFAMA calls for changes to investor protection rules in MIFID II / MIFIR Review
EFAMA has submitted its 
response to the European Commission's consultations on the review of the MIFID II / MIFIR regulatory framework, where it has outlined its recommendations on investor protection and capital markets and infrastructure.
EFAMA's Director General Tanguy van de Werve commented:
Press Release
Distribution ＆ Client Disclosures
PRIIPs
EU Fund regulation
UCITS
Management Companies
AIFMD
Supervision
17 April 2019
EFAMA welcomes final agreement on legislation facilitating cross-border distribution of funds
We welcome yesterday's vote by the European Parliament plenary, formally adopting the trilogue agreement on the Commission's initiative to remove cross-border barriers to the distribution of investment funds.
This marks a decisive recognition of the need to postpone the application of the PRIIPs disclosure regime for UCITS by two years, in light of the regime's documented shortcomings. It also allows the European Commission more time to conduct a thorough review of the same within one year.
Related publications
Publication
Capital Markets Union
Distribution ＆ Client Disclosures
EU Fund regulation
Investor Education
Management Companies
Pensions
Sustainable Finance
Tax ＆ Accounting
10 September 2020
Household Participation in Capital Markets - Country Statistical Profiles
Publication
Capital Markets Union
Distribution ＆ Client Disclosures
PRIIPs
EU Fund regulation
Investor Education
Pensions
Tax ＆ Accounting
Withholding taxes
21 July 2020
3 questions to Sheila Nicoll and Alexander Schindler on the Capital Markets Union High Level Forum
Q #1 What is the difference of the High-Level Forum report to previous initiatives on the Capital Markets Union? What is different this time around?
Publication
Capital Markets
Capital Markets Union
Competitiveness
Data
Distribution ＆ Client Disclosures
EU Fund regulation
International agenda
Management Companies
Pensions
Stewardship
Supervision
Sustainable Finance
Tax ＆ Accounting
11 June 2020
Annual Review June 2019-June 2020
"It gives me great pleasure to provide you with an overview of our activities since our Annual General Meeting in Paris last year. While we were very much looking forward to hosting you all in Brussels this week, the current crisis and associated travel restrictions has forced us to improvise and turn our meeting into a virtual AGM.
Contact
Regulatory Policy Advisor
