Management Companies

EFAMA has been looking at legislative proposals with a direct impact on asset management companies and services, and closely follows any regulatory developments of critical importance to the sector. In addition to issues related to risk management and financial stability, high up on the agenda of EFAMA members is the framework for a prudential regime for Investment Firms (IFD/R), and related implementing measures directly descending from such framework.

EFAMA is focused on minimising the impact of the rules on asset management companies, in particular those holding a limited MiFID license. Key to the sector is the need for proportionality, especially firms that are not authorised to hold client money/securities, or to deal on their own account.

Related policy positions

Policy position

EFAMA response to EBA's CPs on implementation measures of new regulatory framework for Investment Firms

Management Companies

04 September 2020

EFAMA responds to EBA CPs on implementation measures of new regulatory framework for Investment Firms

In light of the current COVID-19 circumstances and the already existing ambitious time table for the implementation, EFAMA calls for the EBA to carefully consider these circumstances and request the EC to postpone the date for the application of the IFD/IFR framework (26 June 2021) and the time table of the level 2 measures (such as the deadline of 26 December 2020 for providing drafted RTS and ITS).

Policy position

EFAMA Reply to consultation for an EC Action Plan to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing

Management Companies

Anti-Money Laundering

26 August 2020

EFAMA Reply to consultation for an EC Action Plan to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing

As highlighted in President’s von der Leyen guidelines for the new Commission, the complexity and sophistication of the Union’s financial system has opened the door to new risks of money laundering and terrorist financing. The European Union needs to step up its regulatory framework and preventive architecture to ensure that no loopholes or weak links in the internal market allow criminals to use the EU to launder the proceeds of their illicit activities.

Policy position

Associations Letter: Integration of sustainability factors and risks into MiFID II IDD and Solvency II

Distribution ＆ Client Disclosures

Management Companies

Sustainable Finance

27 July 2020

Associations Letter: Integration of sustainability factors and risks into MiFID II IDD and Solvency II

EFAMA's response to the EBA consultation on draft RTS criteria for the identification of shadow banking entities

Ever since the term “shadow banking” has emerged from the FSB’s working circles in the immediate aftermath of the 2008 global financial crisis[1], our association has consistently argued that its use as a reference to regulated asset management companies and their funds is inaccurate and mis-leading.

Policy Position

Distribution ＆ Client Disclosures

Management Companies

29 September 2021

Distance marketing of consumer financial services – Review of EU rules

EFAMA provided high-level comments to the Commission’s consultation on the potential review of the Directive on Distance Marketing of Consumer Financial Services.

We agree with the Commission’s interpretation that the Directive is seen as a “safety net” for financial services not already subject to product-specific legislation. Fund and asset managers are already subject to various, more stringent and detailed sectoral legislations, such as (but not limited to) UCITS, AIFMD and MiFID as well as the (more recent) Cross-Border Fund Distribution Directives.

Policy Position

Distribution ＆ Client Disclosures

PRIIPs

EU Fund regulation

Management Companies

04 August 2021

EU retail investments: comprehensive strategy to increase retail investor participation required

EFAMA wholeheartedly supports a retail investment strategy that gives EU citizens the necessary tools and the confidence to put their savings to work by investing in capital markets.